Dec. 31, 2023

2023's Worst Films: Critics' Roundup on First on Film | S02E28 Air

**Host:** Alex First
**Guest Critics:** Jacqui Hammerton, Peter Krauss, Greg King
**Episode Summary:**
In this special year-end episode of "First On Film and Entertainment," host Alex First is joined by film critics Jacqui Hammerton, Peter Krauss, and...

**Host:** Alex First
**Guest Critics:** Jacqui Hammerton, Peter Krauss, Greg King
**Episode Summary:**
In this special year-end episode of "First On Film and Entertainment," host Alex First is joined by film critics Jacqui Hammerton, Peter Krauss, and Greg King. They engage in a lively and humorous discussion, each sharing their lists of the worst movies of 2023. The episode is characterized by friendly banter, insightful commentary, and diverse opinions on the year's cinematic disappointments.
**Highlights:**
- Alex First introduces the episode and welcomes the critics, setting the tone for a mix of fun and insightful film criticism.
- Each critic shares their unique perspective on the year's worst films, with Alex First starting the conversation by strongly criticizing a British drama titled "LA Loya." He describes it as a dismal portrayal of a geriatric hospital facing closure, highlighting its weak narrative and unconvincing characters.
- Jacqui Hammerton challenges Alex's views, revealing differing opinions among the critics. She shares her own list of the worst eight films, notably omitting a bottom ten due to successfully avoiding many bad movies.
- Peter Krauss and Greg King add to the discussion with their selections, indicating a broad range of cinematic disappointments from various genres.
- The critics engage in playful debates and express contrasting views on several films, adding depth and variety to the discussion.
- The episode wraps up with Alex First summarizing the key points and expressing excitement for the next year's film offerings.
**Closing Note:**
This episode offers a candid and entertaining roundup of 2023's least impressive films, as seen through the eyes of experienced critics. It's a must-listen for movie enthusiasts eager to hear diverse perspectives on the year's cinematic landscape.

This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5645288/advertisement

Transcript

1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:08,000 First on film and entertainment the end of year spectacular to determine the best and 2 00:00:08,000 --> 00:00:14,120 worst movies of 2023. Alex first is my name, joining me the one and only Jacqui Hammerton 3 00:00:14,120 --> 00:00:19,480 who occasionally puts in an appearance and sometimes remembers what time it is. Hello, Jacqui. 4 00:00:19,480 --> 00:00:24,920 Well then you value me more than ever. Thank you so much, Alex and good morning to everyone. 5 00:00:24,920 --> 00:00:29,800 I basically triple your income as a result because we care for you so deeply and passionately. 6 00:00:29,800 --> 00:00:35,080 That's what it's all about Peter Krauss. You're the second recalsterant of the group and, you know, 7 00:00:35,080 --> 00:00:41,080 I'm just I'm dreading what your top 10 is going to be. Is that the right attitude I have? Yes. 8 00:00:41,080 --> 00:00:49,880 Be afraid. Be very afraid. Exactly Greg King, can you bring some sense into this conversation? Welcome. Hello. 9 00:00:50,760 --> 00:00:57,480 And I got it. Yeah, exactly. This is going to be fun and mayhem for all times. Now, okay, we are 10 00:00:57,480 --> 00:01:01,160 going to do it this way and we're doing this on the run and it all like gets fucked up and 11 00:01:01,160 --> 00:01:08,120 don't worry about it. It'll work out in the wash. Firstly, we are going to go to your worst movies 12 00:01:08,120 --> 00:01:14,600 and I'm going to kick it off with something I've not done before. Usually I've a bottom 10 13 00:01:14,600 --> 00:01:22,680 and some underbubblers. This year, undoubtedly, one movie has stood the test of time and stood out 14 00:01:22,680 --> 00:01:29,720 as being appalling and that is the only film I'm going to mention because the rest are better than 15 00:01:29,720 --> 00:01:36,440 this and not in the same ballpark. So I'm going to start with my worst. I'll call it and I'm not 16 00:01:36,440 --> 00:01:42,760 sure what to say. The dog of the year, but dogs are beautiful. So it's probably faint praise, but 17 00:01:42,760 --> 00:01:50,280 it's called LA Loya and I cannot think of too many films I've detested more than this British drama 18 00:01:50,280 --> 00:01:59,240 based on a 2018 play of the same name by Alan Bennett. It's set in a small geriatric hospital in 19 00:01:59,240 --> 00:02:05,480 West Yorkshire threatened with closure due to National Health Service funding cuts and the 20 00:02:05,480 --> 00:02:11,880 most loyal of staff is a doctor called Valentine for whom nothing to do with a patient and patient 21 00:02:11,880 --> 00:02:17,640 care is ever too much. The head nurse played by Jennifer Saunders is about to be honored 22 00:02:17,640 --> 00:02:22,840 her services to the hospital and a film crew is invited to document a volunteer led effort to 23 00:02:22,840 --> 00:02:29,400 save this particular institution. That includes interviewing the chairman of the board and several 24 00:02:29,400 --> 00:02:36,040 residents, including one played by Derek Jacobi. One that is not interviewed though, but who's given 25 00:02:36,040 --> 00:02:43,000 an iPad to record her experiences is a retired librarian played by Dame Judy Dench and arriving 26 00:02:43,000 --> 00:02:48,280 at the hospital to visit his sick father who happens to have been a former coloneliner is a 27 00:02:48,280 --> 00:02:53,640 management consultant to the health secretary who recommended closing the facility and so you can 28 00:02:53,640 --> 00:02:59,240 imagine how popular he is. Anyway, I thought I was watching a really bad play. Most of the elderly 29 00:02:59,240 --> 00:03:05,480 patients were nothing more than caricatures and the movie is just mired in this paternalistic 30 00:03:05,480 --> 00:03:11,640 nonsense. It looked like it felt like a PR exercise extolling the virtues of caring for patients. I mean, 31 00:03:11,640 --> 00:03:17,480 hey, we know about all that and when this doctor Valentine broke the fourth wall to speak directly 32 00:03:17,480 --> 00:03:23,720 to us the audience, it actually, I genuinely believe it made my skin crawl. If you want to know what 33 00:03:23,720 --> 00:03:31,240 dull looks like, try to sit through the first five-sixth of LA Loya. Something happens there after that, 34 00:03:31,240 --> 00:03:36,120 you know, is the only reason I gave it a score at all because really very little does happen to 35 00:03:36,120 --> 00:03:42,360 that point. I was constantly looking at my watch, imploring the film, I was begging the film to take off 36 00:03:42,360 --> 00:03:47,800 and to me that really gets down to the writing and direction because a decently stovacters has 37 00:03:47,800 --> 00:03:53,640 actually been assembled. So here's the bottom line folks. If you are considering seeing LA Loya, 38 00:03:54,280 --> 00:04:03,560 please think again. I wish I had less than five minutes after entering the cinema. My dog of the year, 39 00:04:03,560 --> 00:04:09,480 LA Loya, which I gave a two out of ten. Jackie Hamilton, your dogs of the year. 40 00:04:09,480 --> 00:04:15,000 Okay, I'll give you my dogs of the year, but the, um, uh, LA Loya just by the way, on IMDB, 41 00:04:15,000 --> 00:04:19,800 I just looked it up, gets a six out of ten, so you're all all on your lines and with one album, 42 00:04:19,800 --> 00:04:23,880 they got it wrong. That's all right. Yeah, I'd like to repeat it. You often get it wrong. 43 00:04:23,880 --> 00:04:29,240 They get it wrong. I don't have a worst 10. I have a worst eight. I came up with because I think I've 44 00:04:29,240 --> 00:04:36,440 managed to avoid quite a few of the bad ones of 2023. Clever, Jack. I'm not going to give a big run 45 00:04:36,440 --> 00:04:40,840 down on each of them. I'll basically give the titles. And if you want to say a bit about each one 46 00:04:40,840 --> 00:04:46,520 or mention more, no, we'll move through these quickly so we can get to the, the really important 47 00:04:46,520 --> 00:04:52,680 stuff, which are the good ones. There were four films that I gave a three out of ten. They, uh, after Sun. 48 00:04:52,680 --> 00:05:00,680 Oh, Mike Bolly, Jackie, I will come another after Sun is in my top 10 great movies of the year. 49 00:05:00,680 --> 00:05:09,400 What are you, what are you on? What are you on? It's mental by call it dodgy. Um, another one 50 00:05:09,400 --> 00:05:15,560 with three out of ten is EO, which was a film I was really looking forward to about, um, you know, 51 00:05:15,560 --> 00:05:21,560 tale of life through a donkey's alright. Yeah. It was just horrible. Uh, another one that I 52 00:05:21,560 --> 00:05:29,960 guess three out of ten was foe. Um, and disappointingly, Sasha Ronan in this weird sci-fi, it was the, 53 00:05:29,960 --> 00:05:37,960 I just didn't get it and it was creepy. Clever, and it's got in, shot in Victoria, shot right here, 54 00:05:37,960 --> 00:05:46,200 beautiful landscape, earth and landscape that, yeah, shot in, in Victoria. Yeah. Okay, great, 55 00:05:46,200 --> 00:05:53,160 didn't know, didn't care. Um, three out of ten for my sale of my love, which was just terribly depressing 56 00:05:53,160 --> 00:06:00,520 and morose. Uh, getting worse, I gave two out of ten to two films. One is The Ruster, which is, uh, 57 00:06:00,520 --> 00:06:07,560 just a fairly recent one, but who they're weaving in. And um, it was about a, uh, an aggressive rooster, 58 00:06:07,560 --> 00:06:16,680 and naked people in the forest and I didn't know why it was even made. Another Australian film, 59 00:06:16,680 --> 00:06:26,680 Slant, which was about a young journalist trying to write a story about a mystery of a dead woman, 60 00:06:26,680 --> 00:06:35,480 and not, not understanding journalism or defamation or research or ethics or anything at all. 61 00:06:35,480 --> 00:06:42,920 So that was baffling, but the worst till the year for me were the big dog and cocaine bear. 62 00:06:42,920 --> 00:06:48,680 So that was, uh, come on, cocaine bear, it's a laughs in it. It was like, you know, 63 00:06:48,680 --> 00:06:54,200 one joke film, so I gave it one point. Oh my god. So was that you were supposed to be here? 64 00:06:54,200 --> 00:07:01,640 Juice, toilet, humor, adult, mean acting like juvenile delinquents in the forest. No things. 65 00:07:01,640 --> 00:07:07,480 So was that your worst of the year? If you have to give one film the worst, the big dog and cocaine bear. 66 00:07:07,480 --> 00:07:13,320 So in other words, you can't split them in terms of bad. As bad as each other. Fair enough. 67 00:07:13,320 --> 00:07:19,400 Talking about bad Greg, give us yours, please, right? So again, we'll race through these as quickly as we can, 68 00:07:19,400 --> 00:07:22,920 so we can get good ones. I'll try to raise half those children from one more 69 00:07:22,920 --> 00:07:28,680 line, but we'll see how we go. Um, this list includes a couple of Jackie mentioned, 70 00:07:28,680 --> 00:07:32,360 that was out with haunted mansion and none necessary, made of the old, 71 00:07:32,360 --> 00:07:34,680 dirty movie film. Oh, right. 72 00:07:34,680 --> 00:07:37,240 rubbish. Rubbish. 73 00:07:37,240 --> 00:07:44,440 Something to up in. Um, I had in the fire as well, the Darth David sci-fi drama with 74 00:07:44,440 --> 00:07:50,520 socio-running and all my school. Um, I can write in cities, the red door, um, 75 00:07:50,520 --> 00:07:55,880 as a skip too far for that series. Um, I think called the machine, which was a vanity 76 00:07:55,880 --> 00:08:01,560 project for some sort of American comedian, um, on wild wacky, spy adventures with Mark 77 00:08:01,560 --> 00:08:07,000 Hamilton, plainly father, didn't like it. Not funny. Unlike St Amir, the, um, 78 00:08:07,000 --> 00:08:11,880 French drama, courtroom drama, it left. Wow. I thought it was fantastic, Greg. 79 00:08:11,880 --> 00:08:18,200 I think this is my time, Alice. I know. We are, we are, I'm, I'm allowed to comment on the fact 80 00:08:18,200 --> 00:08:23,640 that you're, you're turning into Peter and Jackie. It's, that's, we were, I can see you're getting 81 00:08:23,640 --> 00:08:30,120 keep going. Um, I did put all of you down there in, in, in my list of film, I'd enjoy. 82 00:08:30,120 --> 00:08:35,560 Ellen, yeah, wonderful. I also put in there saw 10, which I thought just, um, 83 00:08:35,560 --> 00:08:39,720 graphic, forge of porn. I tried, let us, let us film them. Okay. 84 00:08:39,720 --> 00:08:47,240 Uh, I know it is a silly. Um, it might seem better. We're in three. Yes. Yeah. Um, 85 00:08:47,240 --> 00:08:51,320 everybody loves Jean of French drama. I just went on and on and on. 86 00:08:51,320 --> 00:08:56,760 Which was way too long for what it had to say. So you didn't like Jean? No. I didn't love, 87 00:08:56,760 --> 00:09:01,560 I didn't love Jean. Um, I put in there. I know you, you, you, you, you, Peter likes a bit more 88 00:09:01,560 --> 00:09:06,840 and we did, but the film that we saw for the Scandinavian film, this, uh, let the river run. I 89 00:09:06,840 --> 00:09:13,800 just sort of, ah, you know, I'd bad marks at all. I think called is he an eye? I put in there and 90 00:09:13,800 --> 00:09:19,480 my worst comedy, I saw earlier in the year. I said, supposed a legend romantic comedy called 91 00:09:19,480 --> 00:09:24,920 the honeymoon that a guy goes on a honeymoon in Italy. Um, and he's best made a loud mouth, 92 00:09:24,920 --> 00:09:29,720 too, for more on a compilium and get some in trouble there. I thought you couldn't go wrong making 93 00:09:29,720 --> 00:09:35,160 your film in Italy with his love, this scenery, um, wine, food and all that, but boy was I wrong. 94 00:09:35,160 --> 00:09:44,040 Sorry, could bring okay. I was like the descriptor. All right. Mr. Recalst trending himself. Peter 95 00:09:44,040 --> 00:09:51,480 Rales, come on down guys. All right. I actually compiled a list of 20 films, so the worst of the year, 96 00:09:51,480 --> 00:09:57,400 but I won't, I won't go through those, don't worry. Um, Steve, you only seen 633 films this year. 97 00:09:57,400 --> 00:10:03,720 Did you get up? How many you had seen? Look, it was certainly in the 400s, uh, because of film festivals 98 00:10:03,720 --> 00:10:10,680 and other things, but yeah, anyway, um, and that must admit, if you, if you think about dark places, 99 00:10:11,320 --> 00:10:15,960 just imagine Peter sitting next to you, it's basically always saying, it's going, 100 00:10:15,960 --> 00:10:24,040 thank you, very mad. It's, it'll be me, myself and I on the list. Don't talk about creeping dark places, 101 00:10:24,040 --> 00:10:31,400 keep going is, oh, as I said, be afraid, be very afraid. Um, and I also have to say, 102 00:10:31,400 --> 00:10:40,600 Adeluyo was not a bad film. Oh my golly. Oh, I agree with you, Pinnida. I actually quite liked it. 103 00:10:40,600 --> 00:10:47,400 Of course you would, but there were a bit of spanking, like, you know, make your pattern. 104 00:10:47,400 --> 00:10:50,920 All right. Oh, yeah. You're doing dark rooms up to you, Alex. 105 00:10:50,920 --> 00:10:53,880 I think, what was that? Dark rooms up to you. 106 00:10:53,880 --> 00:10:54,840 Yes. 107 00:10:54,840 --> 00:11:01,480 Anyway, my, my top or worst 10 films of the year, and I'll just go through them quickly. 108 00:11:01,480 --> 00:11:08,040 A lot of these, it's mainly because of writing. I look at the scripts, I look at the story, 109 00:11:08,040 --> 00:11:12,040 and if they don't make sense or if they're not well written, then I immediately just miss them. 110 00:11:12,040 --> 00:11:17,560 But so, sorry, Pinnida, it's quite, yes. You said you had 20, just can you go through your 111 00:11:17,560 --> 00:11:21,720 underbubblers or you don't have those handy? They're the ones. If he does want the title, 112 00:11:21,720 --> 00:11:26,040 so I'm happy to give you the titles, please. All right. The underbubblers, Gran Turismo, 113 00:11:26,040 --> 00:11:32,680 Super Mario Brothers movie, Mafia Mama, Cocaine Bear, Saw X, 114 00:11:33,960 --> 00:11:42,040 One True Loves, Transformers Rise of the Beasts, Hypnotic, 115 00:11:42,040 --> 00:11:50,440 Pope's Exorcist, 65. There you go. There we go. All right. So, have you numbered these, 116 00:11:50,440 --> 00:11:55,560 the 10th worst to the worst or have you just given us the worst 10 in a clump? 117 00:11:55,560 --> 00:12:02,120 In a clump. That's good name for a film. I'm actually going from 10 to 1, 118 00:12:02,120 --> 00:12:08,040 so I'll start with number 10 and I'll start with Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom. What a waste of time 119 00:12:08,040 --> 00:12:16,680 that film was. It's hit a watery gripe, is it? It turned you. Yes. Next is Blue Beetle. These super 120 00:12:16,680 --> 00:12:25,560 hero movies are really getting on my week and I don't mean John's week. Number eight worst film, 121 00:12:25,560 --> 00:12:32,200 Knock at the Cabin, M. Night Siamarlin produced a movie. I enjoyed that. I thought it was, was that had 122 00:12:32,200 --> 00:12:41,800 elements? Yes, but they were buried far beneath under the DNA. Number seven, Magic Mike's Last Dance, 123 00:12:41,800 --> 00:12:48,360 what a waste of a movie that was. Don't you like seeing writhing bodies that were sort of semi naked? 124 00:12:48,360 --> 00:12:53,000 Is this what we're playing in? Not in the cinema, no. Oh, what? 125 00:12:53,800 --> 00:12:57,480 They used to be sinners in柏 well that specialising at Conor's in Alex. Correct. 126 00:12:57,480 --> 00:13:04,040 But they still exist. I haven't shut it up lately. No, I can't. Okay. 127 00:13:04,040 --> 00:13:10,440 I've been laid along and we forgot through the Dreadges of the cinema this year. Number six, 128 00:13:10,440 --> 00:13:18,600 where are we? Number five. My big fat Greek wedding number three was just poorly written. It should 129 00:13:18,600 --> 00:13:25,160 have been much better than it was. Then I had expendables for which was just a couple together, 130 00:13:25,160 --> 00:13:32,680 action movie without a script. Number three, I must say that the new Hunger Games film disappointed 131 00:13:32,680 --> 00:13:38,200 me so much that I put it in the worst. And yeah, I mean, it wasn't, it wasn't great, but I didn't 132 00:13:38,200 --> 00:13:45,720 think it was a terrible film. Okay. Okay. So the second worst film of the year is Exorcist Believer, 133 00:13:45,720 --> 00:13:51,480 which gave such a bad name to the original Exorcist. Yeah, it was disappointing. Absolutely. Okay. 134 00:13:51,480 --> 00:13:57,480 Again, I'm not sure that I'd put it down that low, but it did disappoint. Yeah. And is the big one? 135 00:13:57,480 --> 00:14:02,920 Drum roll, worst film of the year. Fast X, the Fast and the Furious. 136 00:14:02,920 --> 00:14:09,720 200 million plus was spent on the official effects, the car chases, 137 00:14:11,240 --> 00:14:17,720 all the effects in the film and they spend $2.20 on the script mainly because every second line was 138 00:14:17,720 --> 00:14:22,840 it's all about family. Yeah. I was ready to run a screaming out of the cinema after watching that. 139 00:14:22,840 --> 00:14:29,400 I totally agree, Peter. It was, they've hampered it to such an extent that it's lost any value 140 00:14:29,400 --> 00:14:35,000 whatsoever. And even though people who are car mad will go along and see something like this, 141 00:14:35,000 --> 00:14:41,160 gee, where's it was pedestrian? So I understand that choice. Well, you are on J.A. You are listening to 142 00:14:41,160 --> 00:14:47,480 Jackie Hamilton, great king Peter Kraus and myself Alex first, talk about the worst films and about 143 00:14:47,480 --> 00:14:54,600 to be the best films of the year. Just gone 2023. So by the way, if you want to become a member of J.A. 144 00:14:54,600 --> 00:15:01,560 please do become a member of the community 54 bucks go to jdashair.com.au and you can sign up. We'd 145 00:15:01,560 --> 00:15:09,000 love to have you on board as an official community member. Let us turn now to our worst from our 146 00:15:09,000 --> 00:15:14,200 worst to our best films of the year and again, we'll count them down. There'll be some underbubblers as 147 00:15:14,200 --> 00:15:21,800 well, but given that we'll pay most attention to if you like the top three and given that we've got a 148 00:15:21,800 --> 00:15:27,880 limited time frame, we're not going to go on more than more than about 40 minutes in total. So let 149 00:15:27,880 --> 00:15:34,200 us start Jackie with you. Have you got any underbubblers in terms of the good ones? I do when I've given 150 00:15:34,200 --> 00:15:39,640 underbubblers or as I've called them honorable mentions to the films that I gave an eight out of 10 to 151 00:15:39,640 --> 00:15:48,200 and I think that's a fair, fair mark to give films and that deserve a mention. The various reasons 152 00:15:48,200 --> 00:15:56,040 do want me to just to give the tajels a month for them. So there's a dozen of these, but just running 153 00:15:56,040 --> 00:16:02,120 through quickly, surprise, fun fantasy adventure. Well, I surprised myself liking it so much. It was 154 00:16:02,120 --> 00:16:07,960 Dungeons and Dragons honor amongst thieves. So we're there for a good time. Subtraction, which was an 155 00:16:07,960 --> 00:16:15,080 Iranian mystery. It's just a recent release about a glitch between two families who have a 156 00:16:15,080 --> 00:16:22,120 come out or is that coming out next year? I'm sorry. Okay, it's going. It's not or 157 00:16:22,840 --> 00:16:27,800 represented next year. How's that? Yes, you can do that. Mm-hmm. And then I gave an eight to 158 00:16:27,800 --> 00:16:34,600 was air the story of the Nike story. Yeah, really strong. Join yourself. Women talking, I thought was 159 00:16:34,600 --> 00:16:40,840 a very thoughtful, um, important and beautifully shot film. I can get myself into a lot of trouble 160 00:16:40,840 --> 00:16:48,360 thinking about what I'm thinking. Okay. Okay. The killer, um, again, surprised, uh, this Netflix film, 161 00:16:48,360 --> 00:16:55,080 starring Michael Fassbender, it just had a different approach, um, to, um, the story of, uh, you know, 162 00:16:55,080 --> 00:17:01,080 at, from the point of view of an assassination attempt, I thought that was, it went really well. I 163 00:17:01,080 --> 00:17:10,040 had my heart pumping. That's for sure. The unusual little, um, story called Scrapper, um, about a 164 00:17:10,040 --> 00:17:18,120 quirky character, a girl who was, um, fending for herself until her, um, unlikely father turned 165 00:17:18,120 --> 00:17:27,000 up over the back fence, after her mother had, um, one life, of course, the, um, Antony Kins and the 166 00:17:27,000 --> 00:17:33,320 younger actor Johnny Flynn, the way he just absolutely so perjuly will trace Antony Hopkins at all, 167 00:17:33,320 --> 00:17:39,240 the character, um, as a young man, I thought that was beautiful film, um, but it was just very 168 00:17:39,240 --> 00:17:46,440 annoyingly ruined by the trailers that showed the ending, even though it's a true story and maybe 169 00:17:46,440 --> 00:17:52,600 we know the ending, but I didn't and then, but I did because I saw the trailers. Um, I'll give 170 00:17:52,600 --> 00:17:59,880 an eight to Paris Memories, which I thought was a fabulous, um, what do we call it? It's kind of a 171 00:17:59,880 --> 00:18:06,760 psychological thing of, of there's a, there's a, um, uh, shooting crime, shooting spring, a restaurant, 172 00:18:06,760 --> 00:18:11,320 and it's the way of men and other participants or survivors, they're pieced together, 173 00:18:11,320 --> 00:18:17,960 their lives after that, I thought that was quite special. I liked my old school, the, it based on the 174 00:18:17,960 --> 00:18:24,520 true story of, um, and then who, um, wanted to become a doctor and study medicine, but, um, 175 00:18:24,520 --> 00:18:30,600 failed at school and then he returned to school when he was 13 years old. It's a true story. Amazing, 176 00:18:30,600 --> 00:18:38,520 I agree. It's in my doctorate. I thought it was extraordinary and I like the documentary style mixed 177 00:18:38,520 --> 00:18:45,400 with the, this little animation stuff going on and then the man himself who is the subject of 178 00:18:45,400 --> 00:18:51,080 this documentary did the voice either, but didn't want to appear in it. So Alan coming, lip-synced, 179 00:18:51,080 --> 00:18:59,400 his dialogue, I just thought that was, was it the amazing? It's, it's just the, the making of this in 180 00:18:59,400 --> 00:19:06,760 itself deserves a film. It's, it's, don't we just kept going escalating and escalating and it couldn't 181 00:19:06,760 --> 00:19:12,120 believe that it could be another chapter to it. I loved it, my old school. Uh, my story gave an eight 182 00:19:12,120 --> 00:19:18,440 two, um, which, uh, similar to tar, I just thought, you know, to be both about the conductor composer, 183 00:19:18,440 --> 00:19:25,240 fabulously shot and of course, Bradley Cooper directing it as well. The crime is mine, which is this 184 00:19:25,240 --> 00:19:31,080 fun, fun, fun French melodrama, said in the 30s, um, about, you know, feminism and police 185 00:19:31,080 --> 00:19:38,600 procedures and courtroom drama. I really enjoyed it. It was a rich film. Yeah, it was. Film show about 186 00:19:38,600 --> 00:19:44,440 a, uh, an Indian boys fascinated by cinema and, uh, that brought a tease, my, I thought it was just 187 00:19:44,440 --> 00:19:49,160 absolutely beautiful. Oh no, it's good. So that, that your underbubblers and, and now we're down 188 00:19:49,160 --> 00:19:54,280 at the top 10, but before we do that, we might, um, we might get the underbubblers from Greg. Do you 189 00:19:54,280 --> 00:20:00,680 have any Greg? I have quite a few. Yes. I'm going to as much as I'll know. Yeah. Do whatever you 190 00:20:00,680 --> 00:20:05,000 mean. I'll get in. I'll get in. I'll go for a room for you. Um, some of my underbubbles were 191 00:20:05,000 --> 00:20:10,280 Pearl, which was a sequel to um, X, I, which I really enjoyed. I'm like, Jacky, I get enjoyed 192 00:20:10,280 --> 00:20:15,480 cocaine beer. It was in one of my underbubblers. Um, the Australian horror film talked to me. 193 00:20:15,480 --> 00:20:22,040 Most unusual and unexpected, um, uh, the brook has tarp cast tan. Um, a nice little film from Morocco. 194 00:20:22,040 --> 00:20:28,040 Um, um, Spider-Man across the spider-verse great animation. Now I thought it was really good. 195 00:20:28,040 --> 00:20:33,400 I agreed with Jackie the killer. We're one of my underbubblers there. Um, the New Zealand comedy 196 00:20:33,400 --> 00:20:39,720 Red, White and Brass about a team, um, you're going to, um, get it one their way into the, um, 197 00:20:39,720 --> 00:20:45,320 rugby world cup there and they can be a brass band. I thought there was quite funny. Well done. 198 00:20:45,320 --> 00:20:51,160 No hard feelings. A launching chain comedy with Jennifer Lawrence. Um, they have all the naked 199 00:20:51,160 --> 00:20:55,480 Jennifer Lawrence is good. Right a bit of it. Yeah. Yeah. Um, I also had in there a 200 00:20:55,480 --> 00:20:59,880 French film called Driving Manlund. Um, and look, Charmingville French film about this 201 00:20:59,880 --> 00:21:03,560 taxi driver drives his elderly lady across Paris and the way they connect. 202 00:21:03,560 --> 00:21:08,200 Just the Charmingville film there. I was so putting there a bit of for a gilly pleasure. 203 00:21:08,200 --> 00:21:14,040 Mission impossible. Jedwet Jedwetting part one, um, which had a couple of the best action sequences 204 00:21:14,040 --> 00:21:18,840 for a while there, especially with the, um, train sedans at the end there. Yes, I thought the train 205 00:21:18,840 --> 00:21:23,080 sequence was mind-blowingly good. All right, totally great. Peter, your underbubblers? 206 00:21:23,800 --> 00:21:29,400 Okay. Yes, I had about 17 of those so I'll very quickly go through them. I won't say too much. 207 00:21:29,400 --> 00:21:37,320 Close the built-in film about the two boys. I have my top 12. Very good film. Women talking, 208 00:21:37,320 --> 00:21:43,720 I thought really well written, nicely performed. I thought Babylon had been savaged by so many people 209 00:21:43,720 --> 00:21:49,960 and I thought it was a really interesting exploration of our silent cinema. Um, of an age, 210 00:21:50,760 --> 00:21:58,440 very good Australian film. Um, I also liked the new boy. Um, is on week, yep, John Wick four. 211 00:21:58,440 --> 00:22:05,560 Surprise me. I really liked it. Um, theatre camp, I think was, uh, that was pretty good. 212 00:22:05,560 --> 00:22:11,640 We have a very, yeah, it was. Master Gardner, Paul Schrager, it is a surprise. 213 00:22:11,640 --> 00:22:15,720 Yes, that surprised me. Peter, I, I, I was really taken by it. I, I thought, 214 00:22:16,600 --> 00:22:21,560 Jackie didn't use, so you didn't like that one at all, did you? Uh, nearly when to have my worst list. 215 00:22:21,560 --> 00:22:29,400 Yeah, yeah, uh, because you, you simply thought, uh, so wouldn't, I just couldn't get into it. I didn't get it. 216 00:22:29,400 --> 00:22:36,760 Yeah. Okay. Peter. Uh, I thought, Marby was pretty good. Um, surprisingly, I, I didn't think I was 217 00:22:36,760 --> 00:22:44,760 going to like it. Um, one life, um, as Jackie's mentioned, very good film. Um, I also had 218 00:22:44,760 --> 00:22:51,080 saltburn, uh, knocking on the door of my top 10, uh, Wanka also, uh, was pretty good. 219 00:22:51,080 --> 00:22:56,360 I was really good considering, you know, that, that, that, there's judgments made because 220 00:22:56,360 --> 00:23:01,560 the Willy Wonka story had been told in different forms previously. I thought it was a terrific film 221 00:23:01,560 --> 00:23:06,040 for the family. You could take along your, your parents, your grandparents as well as the, the youngsters 222 00:23:06,040 --> 00:23:10,120 and everybody could get something out of it. And I, I thought Timothy Schell and I did a great job. 223 00:23:10,760 --> 00:23:15,960 Yes. And don't forget it's an origin story. So it's not a remake. And, uh, I noticed a few people have 224 00:23:15,960 --> 00:23:23,000 been saying it's a remake. It's not. Um, and, um, I final four, uh, knocking on the door film, so to speak, 225 00:23:23,000 --> 00:23:30,360 boy in the heron, the Miyazaki animation is, is really, uh, really interesting. Royal Hotel, 226 00:23:30,360 --> 00:23:35,160 a good, strong Australian outback. Really? Really? But, and it, it's based on a documentary that we'd 227 00:23:35,160 --> 00:23:41,400 seen as well, which was also very strong. I prefer the dark, you prefer the jock, do you, Jackie? Yeah. 228 00:23:41,400 --> 00:23:47,080 I thought the dock, uh, blew my mind when I saw that too. I was really distressing to be honest. 229 00:23:47,080 --> 00:23:53,080 And so is this movie. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. It was good. Air, I agree. Was, was, you know, pretty good in 230 00:23:53,080 --> 00:23:58,520 terms of the story. E.O. I'm sorry. I liked that film about the Donkeys journey. I think it had so 231 00:23:58,520 --> 00:24:05,960 much to say about humanity and my other, um, film knocking on the door, leave the world behind a film 232 00:24:05,960 --> 00:24:12,440 that leaves you thinking and discussing so many issues in that film. Fantastic. Well, our folks are 233 00:24:12,440 --> 00:24:20,840 on J.A. 88 FM. I did what Jackie did. I basically looked at my scores and all of these films 234 00:24:20,840 --> 00:24:27,000 received an eight and a half for a bar, but then I had to order them and that's where I got the top 12. 235 00:24:27,000 --> 00:24:33,560 So my 12th best film was my old school, which Jackie was that you mentioning that I think you did. 236 00:24:33,560 --> 00:24:40,200 That was the, the documentary comedy drama, one hour 44 minutes, the true tale of 16 year old 237 00:24:40,200 --> 00:24:46,120 Scott Brandon Lee, not the, the actor son of Bruce Lee, quite remarkable and, uh, it's directed by 238 00:24:46,120 --> 00:24:52,280 Lee's former classmate, John O. McLeod, the way his story unfolds is quite simply mind blowing 239 00:24:52,280 --> 00:24:57,960 I thought that was very, very special indeed. So that was number 12, number 11, again, look 240 00:24:57,960 --> 00:25:04,120 sure the reference close with that you think it was yes, I said, yeah, yeah, that's one hour 44 minute 241 00:25:04,120 --> 00:25:10,120 drama inseparable best friends Leo and Remy 13 year olds, they played together, they 242 00:25:10,120 --> 00:25:16,040 race one another in the fields, they ride their bikes in tandem with reckless abandon and, uh, 243 00:25:16,040 --> 00:25:22,040 and then things happen. So it was Belgium's nomination for Best International feature at the Oscars 244 00:25:22,200 --> 00:25:26,760 and it won the grand jury prize at Khan as well last year. So sensitive, distressing, 245 00:25:26,760 --> 00:25:34,920 coming of age drama, characterised by beauty and set and darkness. So they were my, my 11th and 12th. 246 00:25:34,920 --> 00:25:41,000 So let's now just get it and I'm really deliberately mixing this up. Jackie, what was your 10th best film 247 00:25:41,000 --> 00:25:48,040 of the year? Oh, well, um, as I said, I went, the ones I've mentioned, my honorable mentions all got 248 00:25:48,040 --> 00:25:56,920 eight out of 10, yeah, seven, eight and a half out of 10. Oh, sorry, you didn't order them like 249 00:25:56,920 --> 00:26:02,520 I've been ordered. So in that case, if I need to go, like, there's a couple that eight and a half 250 00:26:02,520 --> 00:26:09,400 that are in my eight and a half group that I need to say first and then I'll be up to my top 10. 251 00:26:09,400 --> 00:26:16,920 Okay, so, oh, sorry, I haven't I got your underbubbles, that's my fault. So, okay, what, what, what are 252 00:26:16,920 --> 00:26:25,720 those that that come below 10 that you can see? For five, six, seven, eight, nine, 10. Okay, um, there 253 00:26:25,720 --> 00:26:31,480 are three of them. One is the old oak, which you've already mentioned. One is the boy, the mole, 254 00:26:31,480 --> 00:26:39,400 the fox and the horse, which is a, the Oscar winning short film, an animation, and told you, 255 00:26:39,400 --> 00:26:44,440 since then, or 20 or 300 times to go and say it, Alex, but I'm not sure that you actually did. 256 00:26:45,160 --> 00:26:51,000 I, I did know we were doing short films, but okay, fine. Keep going. That I saw and at one 257 00:26:51,000 --> 00:26:57,080 on Oscar, so I think it's valid. Yeah. That's my decision. Yes. If you want to fight me in the 258 00:26:57,080 --> 00:27:02,120 back of the school yard later, that's fine. And better so on that in the back place. 259 00:27:02,120 --> 00:27:08,520 Also, one eight and a half was close that you've just mentioned. I thought that was the, the boys in 260 00:27:08,520 --> 00:27:13,640 that were, I mean, they were the nacketing. They were just, they, they, they stunning natural 261 00:27:13,640 --> 00:27:19,480 performances by those two boys. I love that film. Yes. So, so we're we now down to number 10. 262 00:27:19,480 --> 00:27:27,960 We got, yes, I'm down to 10 now. Okay. So what is your 10th best film of 20 to 3? 263 00:27:27,960 --> 00:27:35,080 That's all right. I wanted to do it. Please increase the cues. You can say tar as well. Now, 264 00:27:35,080 --> 00:27:41,880 okay. So, so amongst the rest of us, did any, did any of the others have tar in there? tar was my 265 00:27:41,880 --> 00:27:48,440 second best movie of the year. Kate Blanchett just blew me away. Jackie, it wasn't she extraordinary 266 00:27:48,440 --> 00:27:55,080 in terms of watching, not being out. Yeah. Just fascinating escalation of a really 267 00:27:55,080 --> 00:27:58,440 unlikable and increasingly more and more unlikable character. 268 00:27:58,440 --> 00:28:06,440 So fascinating. And the detail in all the orchestral work and that was mumbling, 269 00:28:06,440 --> 00:28:10,520 I thought my story came pretty close to it. I've only got half a point between them. 270 00:28:11,080 --> 00:28:18,440 Well, it's, yeah, well, okay. So, so you've got tar at number, sorry, what number is tar gone blank now? 271 00:28:18,440 --> 00:28:23,640 Is that 10? Okay. So what about you Peter and Greg? Did you have tar on your top 10 or not? 272 00:28:23,640 --> 00:28:29,960 tar was on my list for last year. Okay. Yeah, we had a discussion about that. It was only release, 273 00:28:29,960 --> 00:28:34,360 general release this year. That's the reason we put it on. Greg, what about you? No, it would have 274 00:28:34,360 --> 00:28:40,280 been one of my underbubblers. Okay, fair enough. So, Jackie, you gave it, was that an 8.5 or a 9 275 00:28:40,280 --> 00:28:47,400 for tar? So, I, yep, I know. And I had it at 9 out of 10. And that's, and I ordered my nines. And 276 00:28:47,400 --> 00:28:53,320 this was the top nine. And therefore, got number two position. Okay. Great king. What was your number 10 277 00:28:53,320 --> 00:29:00,120 film, please? I've got a tie between two guilty pleasures with this one. Yes. So on with chapter four, 278 00:29:00,120 --> 00:29:05,160 which is something that has a little pleasure, violence film, quite body count, a couple of the best 279 00:29:05,160 --> 00:29:11,560 action sequences seen in recent memory with that fight outside the, um, Tom Sillis, I have 280 00:29:11,560 --> 00:29:17,400 side the, um, after two months there and that fight on the stairs. And I'll head that finish 281 00:29:17,400 --> 00:29:23,640 to World War Two film, just through there. Ultra bloody. I was so, so much, so much, so great. Yeah, 282 00:29:23,640 --> 00:29:28,920 good on you. Global to drama. Um, has your case of Tarantino and Sergio Leone, stylish, 283 00:29:28,920 --> 00:29:34,920 yet bloody, but proved this stylishly and surprisingly entertaining. So that was those were my number 10. 284 00:29:34,920 --> 00:29:42,040 And Peter, uh, my number 10 film was the best Australian film this year. And that was Shader, 285 00:29:42,040 --> 00:29:48,840 even though it has missed out on being shortlisted at the Oscars for, for next year. It never, 286 00:29:48,840 --> 00:29:56,280 the less is such a powerful little film about a woman who's trying to avoid being abused and 287 00:29:56,280 --> 00:30:02,840 looking after her daughter and is just a beautifully made film. Mm hmm. Okay, in my number 10 film is 288 00:30:02,840 --> 00:30:06,840 one that's been mentioned as well. I think by Jackie, the French committee crime drama, 289 00:30:06,840 --> 00:30:12,360 The Crime is Mine. I gave that an eight and a half out of 10, an hour, 42 minutes, sumptuous, 290 00:30:12,360 --> 00:30:19,400 scrumptious delight. And look, it really got to me from the get go was sort of in Paris in 1935. And 291 00:30:19,400 --> 00:30:24,440 really loved everything about the movie Brighton Breezy, charmingly preposterous and beautifully 292 00:30:24,440 --> 00:30:30,440 scripted and pieced together, twists of plenty and exaggerated affectations adopted by the actors 293 00:30:30,440 --> 00:30:36,360 suited the work perfectly. So that was my number 10. Jackie, what is your number nine film of the year? 294 00:30:36,360 --> 00:30:42,680 Number nine, sick of myself. So different. Well, region black comedy. Do you remember that? It was 295 00:30:42,680 --> 00:30:47,720 not like long ago. It was what October or something. And that's the guy, that's the person wrapped in 296 00:30:47,720 --> 00:30:56,600 in tailing or something. It's a very self-centered young woman who's attention-seeking addicted to 297 00:30:56,600 --> 00:31:02,680 social media and her partner is emerging as a young artist and getting a bit of attention. 298 00:31:02,680 --> 00:31:12,440 And this her attempts to put some attention on herself becomes very self-destructive. 299 00:31:13,640 --> 00:31:20,520 hilarious at the same time. And if anybody else, Greg or Peter, if you've got any of these movies 300 00:31:20,520 --> 00:31:26,520 mentioned in your top 10, please speak up because then we will sort of quickly skip over it when 301 00:31:26,520 --> 00:31:32,760 you get to yours. Did any of you have the Jackie's number nine in your top 10 list, Peter? No. 302 00:31:32,760 --> 00:31:37,640 And Greg? No. Okay. Did you both love it? I mean, I love it. 303 00:31:37,640 --> 00:31:40,680 Yeah. 304 00:31:41,400 --> 00:31:50,520 Okay. So Greg, what's your number nine? Again, I'm going to a couple of ties there. How many of your top 10 305 00:31:50,520 --> 00:31:57,400 Greg? Yeah. There's about 12. Right. Okay. Well, but I said it's a top 12. Okay. 306 00:31:57,400 --> 00:32:04,600 And now I had of an age, the opening night at Melbourne Film Festival from 2022. But this 307 00:32:04,600 --> 00:32:09,000 was a haunting insightful gay scene coming of age film beautifully shot in Melbourne, I thought as 308 00:32:09,000 --> 00:32:13,800 well, and I thought the performances were all excellent. And trying with that was a film called 309 00:32:13,800 --> 00:32:19,320 the Eight Mountains, um, Bittersweet. Yes. That's out there now. That's out there right now. So people 310 00:32:19,320 --> 00:32:22,360 can still go and see it if they want to. Bittersweet beautifully shot, 311 00:32:22,360 --> 00:32:27,320 linguically paste drama, exploring the friendship between Jim Min over the course of four decades. 312 00:32:27,320 --> 00:32:31,880 And it based some evocative and beautiful cinematography of the landscape, too. And I thought 313 00:32:31,880 --> 00:32:36,280 it's two and a half hours long. And I thought, literally, paste, I'm going to fall asleep in this and 314 00:32:36,280 --> 00:32:41,880 I do. So, rightly, I kept me engaged your whole way through Peter number eight. 315 00:32:41,880 --> 00:32:50,280 Number nine. Number nine, sorry. Yes. All those in count here. I like films that are challenging. 316 00:32:50,280 --> 00:32:58,360 And I thought Ari Astor's film, Bo is afraid was out there, very challenging, very clever, but I 317 00:32:58,360 --> 00:33:03,400 really enjoyed it. And Wukin Phoenix really suited the role. Indeed. He did. 318 00:33:04,600 --> 00:33:10,520 If there was a movie bait for Wukin Phoenix, that was it. But yes, there's some remarkable scenes in 319 00:33:10,520 --> 00:33:17,080 that movie. Extraordinary. Very good. I've got that higher up on my list, too, Bo is afraid. 320 00:33:17,080 --> 00:33:20,840 Ah, good. Thank you, Jackie. No, that's good. What number on your list? 321 00:33:20,840 --> 00:33:25,480 I've got it at seven. And what I, one thing I particularly liked about it was, 322 00:33:25,480 --> 00:33:30,840 I was one thing that reminded me more of it. Just recently, I and it's, I think it's being 323 00:33:30,840 --> 00:33:39,160 released January one is Dream Sequence, an Nicholas cage film. Yes. And I just saw, you know, similarities 324 00:33:39,160 --> 00:33:46,200 between the two of those and enjoyed them similarly. But it's, Bo is afraid was number seven for me. 325 00:33:46,200 --> 00:33:51,960 Fantastic. And my number nine was Maestro, which I think you mentioned, Jackie, as well. The 326 00:33:51,960 --> 00:33:57,640 sort of American conductor composer, penis teacher, author, lead at Bernstein and his wife, 327 00:33:57,640 --> 00:34:03,320 the relationship between the two of them played, played remarkably by Bradley Cooper, who's becoming 328 00:34:03,320 --> 00:34:08,760 not only a great actor, but a really great director as well. And Kerry Mulligan plays his wife. That 329 00:34:08,760 --> 00:34:14,280 was my number nine. And you mentioned, you're thinking, yeah, Dream Scenario does release 330 00:34:14,280 --> 00:34:18,200 on the first of January. So we are now down to number eight, Jackie. What's your number eight 331 00:34:18,200 --> 00:34:25,080 film players? Ah, my number eight is Barbie. Ah, okay. I was, I know, I'm finally, I'm finally 332 00:34:25,080 --> 00:34:30,680 an all pink. Yeah. I know, Petty, you mentioned it as well. I was disappointed. I wanted more out of 333 00:34:30,680 --> 00:34:37,400 Barbie, to be honest, but I'm pleased you liked it, Jackie. And I was, I'm not going to go, oh, 334 00:34:37,400 --> 00:34:44,280 she's like, you know, number one, banter in it and the fun and the characters and a lot of political 335 00:34:44,280 --> 00:34:50,200 and social commentary as well too. And, you know, and, and commentary on masculinity as well as, 336 00:34:50,200 --> 00:34:56,120 you know, feminism and feminist, and just like had a big bundle of everything in it. 337 00:34:56,120 --> 00:35:01,480 Oh, Margot Robbie was outstanding. No, no question about that. I just, I was a bit traumatized by 338 00:35:01,480 --> 00:35:07,400 the beginning when the dolls were all battered. But there we go. No, I, I just, I, I thought, I thought 339 00:35:07,400 --> 00:35:13,240 it could have had a little bit more. The set design and the costuming also, I mean, just had a 340 00:35:13,240 --> 00:35:19,560 real look about it. Hmm, fair enough. Greg. I, I mean, he's a Australian document, music 341 00:35:19,560 --> 00:35:25,080 documentaries, finding the voice to timely and engaging documentary about John Farnham, about his 342 00:35:25,080 --> 00:35:29,160 career and the recording of his comeback album, "Whisney Jack" there. I thought it had lots of 343 00:35:29,160 --> 00:35:34,440 interesting interviews and archival footage. And the same about ego, the Michael Bidinski story, 344 00:35:34,440 --> 00:35:39,000 the documentary about Michael Bidinski, the founder of Mushroom Records, an important figure 345 00:35:39,000 --> 00:35:43,800 in Australian music industry for 50 years. Full of interviews, lots of archival footage and 346 00:35:43,800 --> 00:35:48,200 planning and music. And I thought it was a must for music fans and especially Australian music fans. 347 00:35:48,200 --> 00:35:54,920 Hmm, and Peter, your number eight. Number eight was Godland, the Icelandic Danish 348 00:35:54,920 --> 00:36:01,960 co-production about the priest in the 19th century who wanted to build a church in a remote area 349 00:36:01,960 --> 00:36:08,840 of Iceland. And it just had so much to say about culture, religion, politics and society. Yeah, 350 00:36:08,840 --> 00:36:16,520 the, the ending really, whoo, really sort of ignited, did it not after a very, it's, it's got a certain 351 00:36:16,520 --> 00:36:24,120 pace to it, but yeah, it's quite in-sendery. So my number eight is Salt Boone and that's been referenced 352 00:36:24,120 --> 00:36:31,560 as well with comedy drama thriller, 2011 Minutes. What a bombshell of a film. The rules of engagement 353 00:36:31,560 --> 00:36:37,640 are constantly shifting, slow-boone, but when the ax falls, it's anything but blunt and along the way 354 00:36:37,640 --> 00:36:44,040 there is some seriously outrageous moments. And the writer director Emerald Fennel who went whack with 355 00:36:44,040 --> 00:36:50,200 promising young woman set out to make a film about love and the kind of sort of locust, scorch-doodle, 356 00:36:50,200 --> 00:36:54,840 cannibal love that you feel at a certain age. And this is sort of a modern Gothic romance, 357 00:36:54,840 --> 00:37:03,320 class, power and sex collide. So, Barry Kean is he, is he not the one of the actors of the moment? 358 00:37:03,320 --> 00:37:08,760 Is this picture of restraint and conviction? One of the roles of his career, kind of like an 359 00:37:08,760 --> 00:37:13,720 animal watching and waiting for the right time to strike, really like Rosamund Pike as well. 360 00:37:13,960 --> 00:37:21,000 At a wow, but time is an elegant, judgmental mother and Richard E Grant, her aloof husband in this 361 00:37:21,000 --> 00:37:26,600 one, some break out joyous moments. Prepare for a wild and wacky ride, Salt Boone, which was an 362 00:37:26,600 --> 00:37:34,680 eight-nive out of ten for me. We are up to number seven Jacqueline. Yes, we are. My four mentioned 363 00:37:34,680 --> 00:37:41,400 by was afraid is that's a number seven for me. Very good indeed. Gregory, Salt Boone for me, 364 00:37:41,400 --> 00:37:47,400 and that picture from Emile Fennel, Dark Comedy Swiller, sort of like a geobort variation of the 365 00:37:47,400 --> 00:37:52,120 challenge that Mr Ripley makes prior to your revisited. And as you pointed out, Barry Kean was really 366 00:37:52,120 --> 00:37:58,520 great in it. Yeah, it wasn't it? Peter. So, the main number seven was St O'Mayah, a knockout of 367 00:37:58,520 --> 00:38:05,400 the film about Spain's testing. Yeah, actually I regret having not put it in there. I believe that I 368 00:38:05,400 --> 00:38:08,600 also gave that a night and a half out of ten. So, I'm going to have to read, I thought that was a 369 00:38:08,600 --> 00:38:14,440 wonderful film. Peter, yeah, good guess. Yes, woman who is killed a daughter and is on trial and a 370 00:38:14,440 --> 00:38:19,960 journalist who mirrors her own life through the court experience. Really fantastic film. Yeah, 371 00:38:19,960 --> 00:38:27,240 and I know, Greg, you just didn't work for you, huh? That's right. Yep. Fair enough. Okay, so my number 372 00:38:27,240 --> 00:38:31,960 seven is Spider-Man Across the Spider-Burst, which was an underbubble for you, Greg. Yeah, 373 00:38:31,960 --> 00:38:38,440 the animation action adventure, two hours and twenty minutes, a mesmerizing graphics non-stop 374 00:38:38,440 --> 00:38:44,440 of an helter-scelter action. They're the hallmarks. It's a sort of no shortage of dark edges here. 375 00:38:44,440 --> 00:38:49,880 It's a sort of multi-layered, it's real ride. And it sort of picks up after the events of Spider-Man 376 00:38:49,880 --> 00:38:54,760 into the Spider-Burst. This one across the Spider-Burst, centering around a 15-year-old, 377 00:38:54,760 --> 00:39:01,080 called Miles Morales, grounded by his folks. They actually don't know his Spider-Man, and he's reunited 378 00:39:01,080 --> 00:39:06,840 with Spider-Woman from another dimension, Gwen Stacy, and not realizing that Spider-Woman is his 379 00:39:06,840 --> 00:39:13,480 daughter. A policeman is relentlessly pursuing the masked warrior who's accused of murder, 380 00:39:13,480 --> 00:39:17,880 and Miles travels across the multi-burst. And he comes face to face with a gavill gate 381 00:39:17,880 --> 00:39:24,120 of Spider-People. And I tell you what, you've got to concentrate because there are so many threads, 382 00:39:24,120 --> 00:39:29,080 and you don't want to be overwhelmed or lost. But I really enjoyed the family dynamics of Spider-Man 383 00:39:29,080 --> 00:39:37,400 across the Spider-Burst. Number six on J.E. 88 FM, the top six movies of 2023, Jackie Amadon. 384 00:39:37,400 --> 00:39:44,680 Number six for me is Broca, a South Grand Phil by Japanese director who did shoplifters in, 385 00:39:44,680 --> 00:39:50,440 I think it was about 2018 or something, which I absolutely loved as well. This is about a real dodgy 386 00:39:50,440 --> 00:39:57,800 couple of guys on the illegal baby trade business, but deep down it becomes a story of 387 00:39:58,760 --> 00:40:06,840 creation of family, not through blood, but by wanting to hang together, and by meaning something 388 00:40:06,840 --> 00:40:14,120 to each other and backing each other up. And quirky characters, I thought it was quite, it was actually 389 00:40:14,120 --> 00:40:20,360 very humorous and beautifully together, Broca. I gave it 9 out of 10, Broca. 390 00:40:20,360 --> 00:40:26,360 Wow, okay, terrific, Greg. My number six film is Paul Things, the latest film from 391 00:40:26,360 --> 00:40:32,360 Yorgis, Lanthamus. I said, "That one piece comedy, finally extraordinaire lives in journey of self-discovery, 392 00:40:32,360 --> 00:40:36,600 and sexual liberation of an unconventional hero in there." And this is probably the director's 393 00:40:36,600 --> 00:40:41,800 most accessible and entertaining film to date. Today, I thought Emma Stone was fantastic, 394 00:40:41,800 --> 00:40:46,440 you know, a complicated and complex role there. Mark Ruffler, I thought we're having a lot of fun 395 00:40:46,440 --> 00:40:52,120 in his role as a Lucian Roya. And I thought William Gafo was also sympathetic in his role as a 396 00:40:52,120 --> 00:40:57,640 mad scientist, father fidget type. Apparently he made up sessions for four hours to create that 397 00:40:57,640 --> 00:41:02,920 just fidget phase there. And I thought it was gorgeously shot by Robbie Ryan who gave an 398 00:41:02,920 --> 00:41:09,240 artificial visual quality there. Paul Things, just a film not easily forgotten once you've seen it. 399 00:41:09,240 --> 00:41:16,040 I totally agree, Greg. It was my number four film of the year, and it just blows your mind when you see 400 00:41:16,040 --> 00:41:21,000 it, the creativity involved, and I know it's not an original work, it's sort of that, I think it was 401 00:41:21,000 --> 00:41:27,160 taken from a book, but it is just well worth seeing. I've recommended to my brother-in-law, and he 402 00:41:27,160 --> 00:41:33,400 thanked me profusely. So, it did only open on Boxing Day. So folks, you've got plenty of opportunities to 403 00:41:33,400 --> 00:41:39,320 see it. Peter, it was Paul Things in your time. If you don't want to see it, take my advice and don't 404 00:41:39,320 --> 00:41:46,760 bother. Oh, my golly. Now, if ever- I thought it wasn't very wrong. Yeah, I think Paul, 405 00:41:46,760 --> 00:41:54,920 through it so much, and Emma Stone is amazing, but not disfilled. If ever Jackie has been wrong, 406 00:41:54,920 --> 00:42:02,040 she's never been more wrong than now. I was pretty aptly ignore anything that comes out of 407 00:42:02,040 --> 00:42:07,560 a mouth from here on in based on what not liking four things. Peter, did you like it? Paul Things was 408 00:42:07,560 --> 00:42:12,120 my third best film of the year. I was just so impressed. I love challenging out their films, 409 00:42:12,120 --> 00:42:20,520 and this one is definitely one. But going back to number six, I am a really great fan of 410 00:42:20,520 --> 00:42:26,520 Wes Anderson because I love the way he challenges audiences. His scripts are very cleverly written 411 00:42:26,520 --> 00:42:32,200 in so far as they don't easily make sense, but you have to put various threads together. And his 412 00:42:32,200 --> 00:42:38,920 satire of the fifties in Asteroid City impressed me, and so it was my number six film. 413 00:42:38,920 --> 00:42:44,600 So, Jackie, is there anything apart from Emma Stone? Is there anything would you can say about four things? 414 00:42:44,600 --> 00:42:56,600 Hey, Sirsch, but I didn't enjoy it at all, not at all. I found it disturbing and- 415 00:42:56,600 --> 00:43:01,560 Freak and Stein, that's, I mean, it's a fragment story. Yeah, Jackie, that's, it's a- 416 00:43:01,560 --> 00:43:06,120 I have a different one story. Yeah, I'm just telling you where you can't argue with me. That's my view. 417 00:43:06,120 --> 00:43:10,520 No, your views, you're in touch with your view even though it's wrong, it's good. 418 00:43:10,520 --> 00:43:15,400 I was fabulous, actually. I thought his role was brilliant. Sorry, 419 00:43:15,400 --> 00:43:25,960 Willem DeFar? Yeah, yeah, he was terrific. Okay, my number six, did you say after Sun was in your 420 00:43:25,960 --> 00:43:32,840 shockers or something? Jackie as well? Yes, it's just reinforces everything I know about you. 421 00:43:33,400 --> 00:43:40,200 And my number six best film, Eight and a half out of ten, sensitive, heartfelt, naturalistic film 422 00:43:40,200 --> 00:43:45,560 by DeBouh writer and director called Charlotte Wells Beautifully Reflected Peace concerning an 11-year-old 423 00:43:45,560 --> 00:43:51,160 girl. And the last holiday she took with her father about 20 years earlier, it was really beautiful. 424 00:43:51,160 --> 00:43:56,360 Much of it's left unsaid up to us the audience to interpret, not clear until late in the 425 00:43:56,360 --> 00:44:02,440 piece of the time frame between the events captured and when the young girl is in the present day, 426 00:44:02,440 --> 00:44:08,600 but having said that, I thought that device used by Charlotte Wells worked really perfectly. And I 427 00:44:08,600 --> 00:44:14,680 call it a film for selective taste, but it's a genuine piece of movie magic. There we go. Number five, 428 00:44:14,680 --> 00:44:22,520 Jackie. Number five, The Blue Caff-Tan set in Morocco, a nine out of ten from me. I thought it was 429 00:44:22,520 --> 00:44:28,280 absolutely beautiful. A husband-wife relationship, this beautiful intricate work dress making, 430 00:44:28,280 --> 00:44:34,760 embroidery, by craftsman, this traditional thing, traditional, but there's a secret in the marriage. 431 00:44:34,760 --> 00:44:44,520 A young apprentice is brought into the business, the wife is unwell, there's a different spark 432 00:44:44,520 --> 00:44:54,040 starts up. And it's a very, very tender film that leaves you with a lot to think about at the end. 433 00:44:54,040 --> 00:45:00,440 I thought it was beautiful, The Blue Caff-Tan breaking vibes. Well, I agree with Jackie. I had that in my 434 00:45:00,440 --> 00:45:06,760 underbubble, say this, under bubbling sex, tension there is really good too. My number five film is 435 00:45:06,760 --> 00:45:11,320 Open Himer, the epic biopic about Robert Open Himer and the father of the Tommy Bond, 436 00:45:11,320 --> 00:45:15,880 come from Christopher Nolan, Silly Murphy, I thought, inhabit the carus of beautifully, 437 00:45:15,880 --> 00:45:20,360 but I thought Robert Janik Jr was the one who left the biggest impression of this performance there. 438 00:45:21,240 --> 00:45:25,880 And just a nicely crafted film. Peter, was that in your top ten? 439 00:45:25,880 --> 00:45:34,760 Yes, it was. I think it was number four, but we'll come back to that. Number five for me was my 440 00:45:34,760 --> 00:45:41,240 show. Yes, it was a really well-made look at Lynard Bernstein and especially the marriage in 441 00:45:41,240 --> 00:45:46,760 particular, the focus on the relationship there. And I really liked it. Great, was my story in your 442 00:45:46,760 --> 00:45:53,160 top ten? Yes, yes. So it was. Is that the come? Is that actually my number three film? Yeah, good. 443 00:45:53,160 --> 00:45:57,000 Okay, yeah, and that's why I think good. So in other words, it was it, I mean, Jackie was in your 444 00:45:57,000 --> 00:46:02,440 top ten as well, I think you mentioned. It's my, it's my honorable mention just under. So, yeah, so 445 00:46:02,440 --> 00:46:07,080 it's in my top ten. So three of us in the top ten and one is an honorable mention, so that, 446 00:46:07,080 --> 00:46:14,760 that's an nicely consistent film. My number five was Marcel Le Shell with shoes on. What a delightful, 447 00:46:14,760 --> 00:46:20,840 animated comedy drama. One and a half hours. Extraordinary original piece of work delightful, 448 00:46:20,840 --> 00:46:26,840 tale beautifully told. Marcel, voiced by Jenny Slate, there's one inch high shell that came from a 449 00:46:26,840 --> 00:46:32,520 large community of shells. And now only here in his grandmother, Connie, voiced by Isabella Rosalini 450 00:46:32,520 --> 00:46:38,200 remain. And, and into their Airbnb residents and live steps and amateur documentary film, they 451 00:46:38,200 --> 00:46:44,200 get a take off from there. Something very special. Stop-motion animation is state of the art, 452 00:46:44,200 --> 00:46:49,800 building it so seamlessly with live action and such natural dialogue. I thought, got a work of genius. 453 00:46:49,800 --> 00:46:56,440 I was left astounded at the sheer creativity and masterful execution of Marcel, the shell with 454 00:46:56,440 --> 00:47:07,320 shoes on. Number four, Jackie. Past lives. Korean film, you know, distance romance, 455 00:47:08,120 --> 00:47:17,000 re-recovered romance, if you like. A Korean girl who goes to Canada and then on to America and, 456 00:47:17,000 --> 00:47:25,000 you know, she gets married and, and is the re-makes contact again with someone who was a kind of a 457 00:47:25,000 --> 00:47:32,200 school, school romance, you know, when they were very young, primary school, I think. And, 458 00:47:32,920 --> 00:47:39,320 it's just, you know, the husband realises that she was a whole different person. He had never known, 459 00:47:39,320 --> 00:47:47,560 had a whole life before he'd met her. I just, I just, the opening scene, which is then revisited 460 00:47:47,560 --> 00:47:54,600 later in the film, to me, just, I'll never forget it, had a really magical quality. And, we've met in 461 00:47:54,600 --> 00:47:59,960 a past life and we leave a piece of ourselves with every past deep relationship. I thought it resonated 462 00:47:59,960 --> 00:48:06,840 beautifully. Great King. Number four. Again, it's a split about the last film show, which is a beautiful 463 00:48:06,840 --> 00:48:13,560 Indian film, an ode to the lost art of cinema rejection and an evocative celebration of cinema culture, 464 00:48:13,560 --> 00:48:18,280 as you're charming film from India, which was infused with the same love and passion, the cinema, 465 00:48:18,280 --> 00:48:23,320 and the strength of making power as the classic cinema parody. So, with a great little natural 466 00:48:23,320 --> 00:48:29,400 performance from the lead kid, and I also couldn't separate it from the old Oak that probably the last 467 00:48:29,400 --> 00:48:34,520 film from the movie Spectrum, Ken Loach, whose career was spent for, yep, six decades, 468 00:48:34,520 --> 00:48:39,160 although it was a humanistic drama about community, wrestling, jazz, and the applied, and belonging, 469 00:48:39,160 --> 00:48:45,560 and most of the cast is non-professional, but, like, short, through good performances from them, 470 00:48:45,560 --> 00:48:52,120 a nice, nice observed piece of film. You said to me you only had 12 films in your top 10, so far, 471 00:48:52,120 --> 00:48:57,320 I've got 14. Good on you. Okay. And where the... Yeah, I'm on Anway Sissan on message. 472 00:48:57,320 --> 00:49:02,840 Yeah, exactly. Clearly. Peter, what's your number four? Number four, definitely, Openheimer, 473 00:49:02,840 --> 00:49:08,440 really superbly made film. For me, the best part of the film was the last third of the film with 474 00:49:08,440 --> 00:49:16,600 the McCarthy Witch Hunt Trials and how Openheimer was vilified for the scientific breakthroughs that he 475 00:49:16,600 --> 00:49:22,920 did have with the atomic bomb, a really beautifully made film, highly impressed by it, so Openheimer's 476 00:49:22,920 --> 00:49:27,960 definitely number four for me. And we've mentioned poor things, which is my number four, so we are 477 00:49:27,960 --> 00:49:32,840 into the top three Jackie Amitant. What's your third best film of 2023 plays? 478 00:49:32,840 --> 00:49:38,360 And just following on from what Peter just said, I did want to interrupt, but Openheimer is my number three. 479 00:49:38,360 --> 00:49:44,200 I gave it a nine out of ten. I thought it was absolutely gripping and really a way of bringing 480 00:49:44,200 --> 00:49:49,960 together all those different threads of the story at different time periods and the cinematography 481 00:49:49,960 --> 00:49:55,880 was great attention to detail and just like the weaving of the timelines into the narrative and 482 00:49:55,880 --> 00:50:00,520 it was just totally gripping Openheimer. Great. Your number three. 483 00:50:00,520 --> 00:50:05,800 As I mentioned before, my show, setting film from Bradley Pugra is a director there, 484 00:50:05,800 --> 00:50:10,040 to buy a pic about Leonard Bernstein. I'm chasing more of an impression, you see it approaching 485 00:50:10,040 --> 00:50:15,080 the material and I thought Bradley Cooper is the director made some bold stylistic choices here, 486 00:50:15,080 --> 00:50:20,520 shooting some scenes in Blake and White, Boxy, Rage Academy, Rageo there. And I thought he's 487 00:50:20,520 --> 00:50:25,560 performance as Bernstein was also superb and he had the character and I thought Telly Mulligan was 488 00:50:25,560 --> 00:50:31,400 also great as his wife and she matches him all the way and there's a force to be ready in her own 489 00:50:31,400 --> 00:50:34,920 right and engaging job and biopic. Peter. 490 00:50:36,920 --> 00:50:40,920 Number three, Paul thing, definitely. Yeah, that's the third film. 491 00:50:40,920 --> 00:50:47,480 Yeah, very, very good. Okay, we're down to the last two and we're limited in time. So, what is your number three? 492 00:50:47,480 --> 00:50:52,440 I'm on number three. Sorry, I apologize quite rightly. The while, I thought, 493 00:50:52,440 --> 00:50:57,720 a film that excited me more than any other post lockdown because we of course had periods where 494 00:50:57,720 --> 00:51:02,840 we didn't see anything. And while the story is remarkable, it's the acting that had me championed 495 00:51:02,840 --> 00:51:08,200 the bit to recommend it. It also marked the return of Brendan Fraser. I was so excited by that 496 00:51:08,200 --> 00:51:14,440 film of rare quality worked its way to my psyche as only the finest offerings can gave it a nine out of 10 497 00:51:14,440 --> 00:51:20,760 set in a small rundown first floor apartment in Idaho and Brendan Fraser's characters is middle-aged 498 00:51:20,760 --> 00:51:25,720 online, you to English teacher who's morbidly obese, blood pressure off the charts, 499 00:51:25,720 --> 00:51:32,040 suffering from congestive heart failure. He can hardly move and he orders daily pizzas and lives alone 500 00:51:32,040 --> 00:51:37,480 in the apartment, never leaves relies upon daily visits from an earth friend. That is the while. 501 00:51:37,480 --> 00:51:43,640 Number two, Jackie. Well, the problem here is that unlike Greg, I've been very fair about this 502 00:51:43,640 --> 00:51:50,200 and just been marking even though they get the same score working by way the up to 10. And I've 503 00:51:50,200 --> 00:51:56,680 reached the point where I have two films on 9.5. They cannot separate them. They are poles apart. You 504 00:51:56,680 --> 00:52:02,440 will not believe that these two films are the favourable ones coming out of one person. Jackie, we've got 505 00:52:02,440 --> 00:52:09,320 two minutes left in the whole session. Go for it. What are they? Saltburn? Yes. And Marcel the show 506 00:52:09,320 --> 00:52:13,880 was shoes on. How is that two different films? Sadly both of which have been mentioned, 507 00:52:13,880 --> 00:52:20,200 terrific. Greg King. My seventh film was "Till the Powerful Drama, Exploring Racism and Prejudice 508 00:52:20,200 --> 00:52:25,480 and Abraighten Miss Codew Justice in Emeritus Deep South" based on his true story. I thought it was a 509 00:52:25,480 --> 00:52:32,600 powerful hell of outrage that actually made me angry. Good on you, and Peter. Number two was "Past Life" 510 00:52:32,600 --> 00:52:38,920 superb film, "Slighting Door's Storyline" excellent. Excellent film. And mine was tar, which we've 511 00:52:38,920 --> 00:52:45,080 mentioned at the outset. So we come to number one. Jackie has already mentioned her two, which is 512 00:52:45,080 --> 00:52:48,760 terrific. And Marcel the show was shoes on and what was the other one, Jackie? I'm sorry. 513 00:52:49,320 --> 00:52:56,920 And Saltburn, oh my god, they loved it. Yeah, it was a terrific film. Okay, Greg. What, number one? 514 00:52:56,920 --> 00:53:02,440 That was... Yes, number one. Which close, the beautiful film from Belgium about the friendship between 515 00:53:02,440 --> 00:53:07,480 the two young boys, their whose friendship was misinterpreted by school bullies and led to tragedy. 516 00:53:07,480 --> 00:53:12,040 I thought it featured fine natural performances from the two young ladies, which beautifully shot 517 00:53:12,040 --> 00:53:19,240 a gesture delight for little film. I was a delight for little film. And Peter Krauss, I'm curious. 518 00:53:19,240 --> 00:53:27,560 Go for it. My number one film is "Mountain Scorsese superb" evocation of the implications of 519 00:53:27,560 --> 00:53:34,120 indigenous involvement, et cetera. "Killers of the Flower Moon" just a superbly made film with 520 00:53:34,120 --> 00:53:38,200 so much in the storyline. There is so much in the storyline. It could have been longer and broken 521 00:53:38,200 --> 00:53:43,560 into two, with my opinion, all that. But I thought it was... The only thing I didn't like about it was the 522 00:53:43,560 --> 00:53:51,880 scale that was permanently affixed to Leonardo DiCaprio's face, Peter. Does that really matter? 523 00:53:51,880 --> 00:53:57,240 I think it does. It's such a significant part of the film. My number one film was already been 524 00:53:57,240 --> 00:54:03,000 mentioned "Opponimer". I thought it was incredible. I who usually criticise the running time of a movie. 525 00:54:03,000 --> 00:54:09,640 This was three hours. Absolutely. I was transfixed for the entirety of the movie. And like Greg, 526 00:54:09,640 --> 00:54:15,640 I thought that, well, there is Oscar's waiting for this movie. We're not just talking 527 00:54:15,640 --> 00:54:22,040 silly and murphy. He was absolutely brilliant, but Robert Downey Jr as well. It was very much a scene 528 00:54:22,040 --> 00:54:27,320 stealer. And it's a terrific film. I mean, what a great film maker Christopher Nolan is. 529 00:54:27,320 --> 00:54:32,840 Thank you very much indeed. Jackie Hamilton at Pleasure, Peter Krauss. Pleasure as well. 530 00:54:32,840 --> 00:54:38,600 Great King. Bring some sense and sensibility to our top and bottom. Ten. We'll do it all again 531 00:54:38,600 --> 00:54:45,480 next year hopefully. All things being equal and we'll be back next week on First Enfield and 532 00:54:45,480 --> 00:54:47,320 Entertainment.